Dr. Perv.'s Rating:

Starring: Victoria Paris, who makes my tongue hard. Cassidy who is just, plain cute. Nice ass, too. Teri Diver, an underused performer in this vid. All she did was go down on Victoria Paris briefly. Sharise, who gave us the only anal in the piece. Mike Horner Ugh! Jon Dough and Nick East, but who cares?

This vid is a valiant effort to make a "psycho-drama" with sex. It almost succeeds. It is very nicely filmed in two or maybe three different locations. It really looks as though the people who make it care about it.

There can be no question that this is a Victoria Paris vehicle. She is very good at appearing aroused. Unfortunately, she is up againts Mike Horner's attempts at acting, which detract from everything else in the movie. He tries for "seductive", but comes in somewhere between "annoying" and "creepy". It really turns down the heat.

There are several things that made this movie worth seeing.

One of them was that we got to see Victoria Paris getting dressed a couple of times. There is something about watching a woman get dressed that turns me on like a light switch. Speaking of Victoria Paris, Jeez, what a body! Yes, I know that it isn't natural, but still. . .

Another plus is Cassidy. I always thought that she was very cute in a soft girl-next-door-way (Hey, you'd do her. ).

I also liked that in most of the scenes that included boy/girl sex, we get to see the girls get or be undressed.

It was also nice that the sex scenes themselved weren't overlong. Many times, I think that sex scenes drag out. Seven minutes is plenty, ten is pushing it. If you have to start looping things, you've run long.

In the only anal scene in the video, (Sharise with Nick East) we get to see the beginning of the insertion. That's good.

And, of course, this movie was made before female porn performers started going nuts with the tattoos and piercings. I hate tattoos on girls.

Well, to start with, seeing Mike Horner trying to act.

Next, I'm kind of an old rain-coater and like my porn fairly raunchy. Say somewhere between the old "Caught from Behind" series and almost anything from "Private". I don't mind a story, but I want it wrapped around plenty of anals, DPs and facials.

I also didn't like that there was only one act of anal intercourse in this whole thing. While it was not billed as an anal movie, anytime I see Sharise, Chrissy-Ann and Cassidy in one movie, there had better be more than one buggering.

Speaking of Chrissy-Ann, her name appears on the box cover and in the end credits. She plays Victoria Paris' secretary. She does not, however, have sex in this video.

I suspect some sort of foul-up. The credits also list a character named "Motel manager". There was no motel scene. I would have to guess that there is a scene missing, for one reason or another, and that it is the scene in which Chrissy-Ann had sex. Too bad. There also wasn't a single facial.

Oh, So close. On the whole, this was not a bad flick. It was well-shot. It had reasonably attractive people having nice, vanilla sex. It wasn't meant as a stroker movie, so it gets off the hook for it's lack of facials and single anal. What hurts it the most, in my eyes, is the inclusion of Chrissy-Ann's name on the box cover even though she doesn't have sex in the movie. Everything on the box cover is there to sell the movie. I'm willing to believe that this is an innocent mistake and not an outright fraud. VCA has earned my trust over the years. If Chrissy-ann's scene had been included, I would have given it a low second place. As is, it gets a high third palce: 6

Posted By Dr. Perv., www.excaliburfilms.com | 10/12/06 1:58 PM